SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 29764

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R. POORNIMA, J
Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Claimants – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:
For the Respondents:

(Judgment of this Court was delivered by R.POORNIMA, J.)

The appellant / 2nd respondent-Insurance Company has filed this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal against the fair order and decreetal order dated 07.10.2017 passed in MCOP No.44 of 2009 by the file of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Subordinate Court, Srivilliputhur.

2.Brief case of the claimant before the lower Court is as follows:

(a)The claimants are the brother and sister of the deceased Chidambaram. The parents of Chidambaram died long back. The deceased was under the care and custody of the first claimant and second claimant. The petitioners made arrangements for the marriage of their deceased brother Chidambaram. Apart from the petitioners, the said Chidambaram had two brothers and one sister, namely, Govindan, Irulandi and, Ramalakshmi who were arrayed as respondents 3 to 5. The third respondent T.R.Govindan is working as a manager in State Bank. The fourth respondent is doing agriculture and brokerage work and leading a wealthy life. The husband of the fifth respondent Ramalakshmi is also working in Indian Overseas Bank as cashier. The above respondents failed to maintain the deceased and deserted him. The petitioners and the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top