Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judge, J
Petitioners – Appellant
Versus
Respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. execution of letters rogatory (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. respondent's objections and defenses (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 3. court's analysis of international comity and evidence (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
| 4. court's directive for execution of letters rogatory (Para 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 5. final orders and directions (Para 64) |
COMMON ORDER
These petitions have been filed before the Intellectual Property Division (IPD) of this Court under Order XXVI Rules 19 - 22 read with Sections 78 and 151 of C.P.C. , seeking to execute the Letters Rogatory dated 13.05.2024 issued by the United States District Court under the Hague Convention , 1870, seeking judicial assistance from this Court against the respondent. Letters Rogatory are formal requests from one Court to another to obtain judicial assistance.
2. The petitioners in O.P. (PT) No.5 of 2024 claim that in the case pending before the United States District Court at Delaware, they had alleged, among other things, that the submiss
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
