Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.Lakshminarayanan, J
M.Ilamaran – Appellant
Versus
Nithya – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claim of interim maintenance and employment status. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments against the maintenance amount as excessive. (Para 8) |
| 3. entitlement to maintenance evaluated against actual income and status. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. final dismissal of civil revision petition. (Para 14) |
ORDER
This civil revision petition challenges the order of the learned Family Judge at Puducherry in IA.No.859 of 2022 in MOP.No.247 of 2018 dated
25.09.2024.
2. The civil revision petitioner is the husband. There is no dispute in the relationship between the parties. They entered into a matrimony on 09.04.2017 at Puducherry. Subsequently, due to disputes and differences, the parties separated. The husband invoked Section 13(1)(ia) of the Hindu Marriage Act and presented M.O.P.No.247 of 2018.
3. Summons was served on the wife and she has also entered appearance and filed a detailed counter. Pending disposal of the proceedings, she filed I.A.No.859 of 2022. This was an application under Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act read with Section 20 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.
4. She pleaded that the husband, who is a B.Tech MHRM graduate, has been emp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
