SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 31414

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
,
Insurance Company – Appellant
Versus
Claimant – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: J.S. Murali
For the Respondents:

Table of Content
1. factual background and evidence of accident, injuries, and disability (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 11 , 13 , 14 , 17)
2. court’s analysis on negligence, disability, compensation calculation and legal precedents (Para 5 , 6 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19)
3. contentions on negligence and quantum of compensation (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12)
4. final decision and orders (Para 20)

JUDGMENT

This Civil Miscellaneous Appeal has been preferred against the award dated 24.11.2023 passed in M.C.O.P.No.1230 of 2014 by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Special Sub-Court, Tiruchirappalli, by the Insurance Company.

2.The case as set out in the claim petition is stated in brief:

On 26.09.2013 at about 11.00 a.m., while the petitioner was riding his two wheeler bearing Registration No.TN 47 X 3190 with two pillions(Shanmugasundaram and Santhakumar) along Karur to Pettavaithalai Main Road from West to East direction at a normal speed near AKM Hospital, a van bearing Registration No.TN 42 E 8685, which belongs to the first respondent and insured with the second respondent came at a high speed and in a rash and negligent manner from the opposite direction and hit on the petitioner's two wheeler. Due to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top