Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
,
Petitioner / A Party – Appellant
Versus
3rd respondent / B party – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. history and background of possession dispute and related proceedings (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding possession, evidentiary value of documents and prior orders (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's assessment of possession based on official reports and prior findings (Para 9 , 10) |
ORDER
The Petitioner / A Party in M.C.No.55/2023 challenging the order passed by the 1st respondent, dated 08.08.2023 has filed the present Revision.
2. The brief facts of the case is that the 1st respondent received a report from the 2nd respondent vide I.R.No.24/2023, dated 06.08.2023; that a complaint has been received from the 3rd respondent / B party; that the petitioner / A party has stopped and challenge the 3rd respondent from redoing the fencing of the land and that the petitioner's father Late Ganesan was enjoying the property in Survey No.22/2A of Sellur Village, Karaikal, measuring an extent of 00:02:75 H.A.Ca. When the petitioner /A party went to the land to carryout fence earlier, he was obstructed, there was a dispute in demarking the concrete post for fencing the above said property. Earlier too, there was a damage to the fencing and lastly the damage was done on 06.08
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
