Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
,
The writ petitioner – Appellant
Versus
The second respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background and refusal of registration of sale deed due to objection. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. history of prior litigations and enquiries affirming validity of ryotwari patta. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. court’s observation on lack of evidence supporting objection and finality of settlement. (Para 4 , 5) |
ORDER
The writ petitioner seeks to quash the proceedings of the second respondent dated 12.12.2024, in and by which the petitioner's sale deed that had been submitted for registration, was not registered by the second respondent.
2. The facts that has led to the filing of the above writ petition is herein below set out :
a) It is the case of the petitioner that the land in Krishnapuram Village, Thadaperumbakkam Madura, now known as Thadaperumbakkam-1 Village, Ponneri Taluk, Thiruvallur District was the erstwhile Zamin Village. After the enactment of Tamil Nadu Estates (Abolition and Conversion into Ryotwari Act, 1948) (Act 26/1948), the Government vide its proceedings dated 09.12.1950 and 03.01.1951, had acquired the lands comprised in Survey Nos.77 to 95, excluding the lands in Survey Nos.82/1 and 95/3 of the said Village. Thereafter, by virtue of survey and settlement proceedings, the Se
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
