Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN
petitioner – Appellant
Versus
respondent – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of the petition and basic facts regarding registration refusal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. validity and scope of rule 55-a provisos and subordinate legislation. (Para 4 , 5 , 7) |
| 3. interpretation of transfer of property act sections regarding successive transfers. (Para 6) |
| 4. court’s reasoning on supervisory powers of registrar and limitations of subordinate rules. (Para 8 , 9) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned refusal check slip dated 29.01.2025 passed by the respondent, thereby refused to register the sale deed executed by the petitioner in favour of a third party on the ground that the petitioner failed to produce the original parent document in respect of the petition mentioned properties.
2. By consent of both parties, this writ petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials placed before this Court.
3. The petitioner owned the subject property and intended to sell the same in favour of a third party. After execution of the sale deed, it was presented for registration before the respondent. However, the respondent refused to register the same
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
