SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 32274

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
JUSTICE, J
Suresh Subramaniam – Appellant
Versus
Gayathri Muthuswamy – Respondent
O.S. No. 1298 of 2019



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: [Names not specified]
For the Respondents: [Names not specified]

The suit for recovery of money between spouses is maintainable in a Civil Court, as it concerns civil disputes arising from their marital relationship.

Headnote:(A) Family Courts Act, 1984 - Sections 7 and 8 - Recovery of money - Suit filed by wife against husband for recovery of amounts spent on loans and expenses during marriage - Court held that the suit is maintainable despite marital status, as it concerns civil disputes, and confirmed the lower court's decree for Rs.10,28,366/- with 12% interest. (Paras 20-21)

(B) Jurisdiction - The Civil Court has jurisdiction to entertain suits between spouses for recovery of money, as the matter pertains to civil disputes arising from matrimonial relations. (Paras 20-21)

Facts of the case:
The Plaintiff, after incurring significant expenses for their marriage and supporting her husband financially, filed a suit for recovery against her husband, who had developed an extramarital affair and filed for divorce. (Paras 3-4)

Findings of Court:
The trial court found that the Plaintiff provided substantial financial support to the Defendant, and the Defendant failed to prove repayment of the amounts claimed. (Paras 6-19)

Issues: The main issues were the maintainability of the suit, whether the claim was barred by limitation, and jurisdiction of the Civil Court. (Paras 12-13)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the suit is maintainable as it concerns a civil dispute between spouses and is not barred by limitation, confirming the trial court's jurisdiction. (Paras 20-21)

Result: Appeal dismissed; judgment and decree of the trial court confirmed.

Table of Content
1. marriage and financial contributions (Para 3 , 4)
2. defendant's denial and claims (Para 5 , 8 , 9)
3. plaintiff's financial support and defendant's infidelity (Para 10 , 11)
4. evidence and claims for recovery (Para 14 , 15)
5. court's reasoning on financial claims (Para 18 , 19)
6. maintainability of suit in civil court (Para 20 , 21)

JUDGMENT

This Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment and decree dated 24.01.2020 passed in O.S. No. 1298 of 2019 on the file of the learned Additional Judge – VI, City Civil Court, Chennai.

2. For the sake of convenience, the parties to this appeal shall be referred to as per their rank in the trial court as Plaintiff and Defendant.

3. The Plaintiff is the wife of the Defendant herein. Their marriage was solemnised on 01.06.2014 at Arulmighu Karumari Amman Temple, Thiruverkadu as per Hindu rites and customs. Their marriage was a love marriage and the parents of the Plaintiff did not accept her marriage with the Defendant. Even at the time of marriage, the Plaintiff brought 30 sovereigns of gold ornaments and spent Rs.25 lakhs for the marriage. After marriage, the Plaintiff as well as Defendant stayed in the house of the Defendant along with his parents and brother.

4. According to the Plaintiff at the time of marriage, both of them were employed in Citi Bank. It is stated that before the marriage, the Defendant assured the Plaintiff that she can continue the job even after marriage. However, after the marriage, the Defendant asked the Plaintiff to resign her job and to do household works. The Plaintiff was made to do all the house hold works like a servant maid. Further, for one reason or the other, the Defendant postponed to have a child. It is further stated that the Defendant availed loans for the purchase of a car, two wheeler and also availed personal loan. He is a spend-thrift who used to spend lavishly for purchase of dress and other accessories. Even before marriage, the Defendant used to borrow money by citing some reasons, but he never returned back. Similarly, after marriage, the Defendant insisted the Plaintiff to pay him money. Accordingly, the Plaintiff transferred several amount from 2014 till 2017 from her 3 savings bank account, thus, paid a total sum of Rs.7,45,530/-. That apart, the Plaintiff has paid several amount by way of cash to the Defendant, but there was no proof for the same. According to the Plaintiff, she was also constrained to top up the loan and paid the Defendant various amounts and by utilising the same, the Defendant has purchased a bike for Rs.73,709/- and Rs.6,29,905/- for closing the credit card outstanding. Until the Plaintiff was in her employment, she repaid the loan amount from her salary. However, during December 2016, she lost her job and became dependent upon the Plaintiff for everything. However, the Defendant had developed illicit intimacy with one Uma Backiyalakshmi and ignored the Plaintiff. When it was questioned, the Defendant left his house on 27.06.2017 and his whereabouts were not known. The Plaintiff therefore gave a complaint to the ICF Police based on which a case in Crime No. 686 of 2017 was registered. Ultimately, the Defendant was traced at Andaman and he expressed his unwillingness to live with the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the Defendant filed an application seeking dissolution of marriage before the Family Court, Chennai but he withdrew it. Thereafter, he filed HMOP No. 2690 of 2018 before the V Additional Family Court, Chennai. According to the Plaintiff, for the amount paid to the Defendant, she is repaying the loan to the tune of Rs.18,000/- per month. In such circumstances, the Plaintiff has filed the suit for recovery of Rs.7,45,530/-, Rs.10,00,000/- and Rs.4,51,945/- with interest and to direct the Defendant to pay Rs.1,35,000/- being the court fee paid by her for instituting the suit.

5. On notice, the Defendant filed a written statement stating that for commemoration of the marriage, it was the Defe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top