Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N/A, N/A
K.SRIDHAR – Appellant
Versus
THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the case and facts. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding consensual nature of the relationship. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. defense claims of investigation flaws and witness credibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. prosecution's rebuttal of defense arguments. (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 5. court's observations on victim's evidence. (Para 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. discussion on legal standards and evidence. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 7. final assessment of evidence and legal implications. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. conclusion and affirmation of the lower court's judgment. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
This Criminal Appeal has been filed to set aside the Judgment passed by the learned learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track Mahila Court, Cuddalore in Spl.S.C.No.5 of 2014 dated 24.07.2015.
2. The brief facts, which are relevant for consideration in this Appeal, are as follows:-
2.1. The victim in this case lost her mother 10 years prior to the date of occurrence. She was living with her maternal aunt under her care and custody. The maternal aunt of the victim was an agricultural daily wage labourer and she used to work in the field of one Kannaiyan, who is a land own
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
