Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
M.S.RAMESH, N.SENTHILKUMAR, JJ
R.Eswaran – Appellant
Versus
The Bar Council of Tamil Nadu & Pondicherry – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on the nature of show cause notice under advocates act. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. court emphasizes the premature nature of the writ in absence of jurisdictional issues. (Para 4) |
| 3. opportunities for the petitioner to respond to the notice. (Para 5) |
| 4. final ruling on the writ petition and connected proceedings. (Para 7) |
(Order of the Court was made by M.S.RAMESH,J.)
The order impugned in this Writ Petition is a show cause notice issued by the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry under the proviso to Section 26(1) of the Advocates Act, 1961, calling upon the petitioner as to why the petitioner should not be removed from the rolls of the Bar Council of Tamil Nadu and Puducherry, since one of the required pattern of education has not been undergone by him, before obtaining the law degree.
2. For ready reference, Section 26(1) of the Advocates Act reads as follows:-
“26. Disposal of applications for admission as an advocate.
(1) A State Bar Council shall refer every application for admission as an advocate to its enrolment committee, and subject to the provisions of sub-sections (2) and (3) and to any direction that may be given in writing by the State Bar Council i
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
