Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
Mahaa Textiles – Appellant
Versus
T.Mohankumar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of the complaint and conviction under section 138. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioners contest liability based on evidential grounds. (Para 4) |
| 3. analysis of evidence presented by both parties. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. legal presumptions under the negotiable instruments act validated. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. judicial review limitations articulated for the revision court. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. final dismissal of the revision application. (Para 14) |
ORDER
This Criminal Revision Case has been filed by the petitioners/accused to set aside the conviction and sentence dated 29.02.2024 made in C.A.No.274 of 2022 dated 29.02.2024 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Gobichettipalaym confirming the conviction and sentence made in S.T.C. No.920 of 2017 dated 29.11.2022 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No.1, Gobichettipalayam and sentencing the petitioners to undergo simple imprisonment for one year and to pay a compensation of Rs.6,00,000/- to the respondent/complainant.
2. The case of the petitioners is that the respondent/complainant filed a private complaint against the petitioners for the offence under Sections 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act bef
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
