Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
D.BHARATHA CHAKRAVARTHY, J
THE CHAIRMAN – Appellant
Versus
THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. workmen claim permanent status after 480 days of service. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. management argues against claims based on employment status. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. management's legal arguments on employment and contract labor. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's observations on the applicability of the act of 1981. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 5. court's findings affirming workmen's claims and awards. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
COMMON ORDER
All these Writ Petitions are connected and, since identical grounds are raised, are taken up and disposed of by this common order.
A.The Writ Petition:
2. The prayers made in these Writ Petitions are by the Tamil Nadu Generation and Distribution Corporation (TANGEDCO) and its officers challenging the individual awards issued by the authority(respondent No.1 in the respective Writ Petition), under the Tamil Nadu Industrial Establishments (Conferment of Permanent Status to Workmen) Act, 1981 (referred to as 'the Act of 1981'). The awards grants permanent status to the individual Workmen, who are designated as party respondents in the Writ Petitions.
B. The Brief Facts:
3. The workmen submitted claim petitions to the authority, asserting that they had completed 480 days of con
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
