Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.DHANABAL, J
Dr.Muthu – Appellant
Versus
The Executive Magistrate/Tahsildhar Manalmelkudi Manalmelkudi(Taluk) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. quashing of impugned order on procedural violations. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments regarding lack of license and evidence. (Para 4) |
| 3. requirement of taking evidence and following proper procedure. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. final decision to set aside order and remand for fresh proceedings. (Para 11) |
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 06.03.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P.(MD)No.4046 of 2025 and W.M.P(MD)No.2906 of 2025 Dr.Muthu ... Petitioner Vs.
1. The Executive Magistrate/Tahsildhar Manalmelkudi Manalmelkudi(Taluk)
Pudukottai District
2. Sahayamary 3. Anbu Arasu
4. Selvarani (Respondents 2 to 4 impleaded vide Court dated 21.02.2025 ub WMP(MD) No.3279 of 25) ... Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records pertaining to the Impugned Order issued by the Respondent vide R.C.No. 5076/2024/A9 on 07.02.2025 and quash the same as illegal and consequently directing the respondent to permit the petitioner to run the prawn farm situated in Survey No. 349/3, 349/7, 349/9, 349/10 and 349/13 situated at Raja Thoppu Village, Manalmelkudi T
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
