Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, B.PUGALENDHI, JJ
M.Arumugam – Appellant
Versus
The District Collector / Mon – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.6036 of 2025 | W.M.P(MD)No.4432 of 2025
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's grievance regarding eviction without due process. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. assurance given by the respondent's counsel about eviction process. (Para 3) |
ORDER
Heard both sides.
2.The petitioner's grievance is that without following due process of law, the petitioner is sought to be dispossessed. It is not in dispute that Survey No.195 of Mathur Village is a water body.
3.The learned Special Government Pleader undertakes before us without passing final order under Section 6 of the Land Encroachment Act, 1905 dispossession will not be resorted to.
4.Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is disposed of.
There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
