Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN, J
Bernard Vimalraj – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed to quash fir based on insufficient evidence. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments regarding the nature of allegations under ipc provisions. (Para 2 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. court observations on malafide intentions in complaints. (Para 5 , 9) |
| 4. legal reasoning outlined for not sustaining charges. (Para 8) |
| 5. final outcome of quashing the fir. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed seeking to quash the FIR registered in Crime No.60 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent police, for the offences under Sections 296 (b) and 506(i) of IPC.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent. Perused the materials available on record.
3. The second respondent lodged a complaint alleging that the petitioner had sent a voice message, in which, he abused the second respondent using filthy language and threatened him with dire consequences. Hence, the case was registered.
4. Based on the complaint lodged by the second respondent, the first respondent registered an FIR in Crime No.60 of 2023 for the offences under Sections 294(b) and 506(i) of IPC. Even according to t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
