Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.MURALI SHANKAR
Rajasekar – Appellant
Versus
Ashok Kannan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conclusion on dismissal of criminal revision petitions (Para 1) |
| 2. factual background and history of property disputes and rera orders (Para 2 , 3 , 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 3. court's reasoning on misuse of criminal procedure in civil disputes (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments for criminal prosecution based on alleged trespass and damage (Para 7) |
ORDER
These Criminal Revisions are directed against the common order passed in Crl.M.P.Nos.8882, 8883 and 8884 of 2024 dated 24.05.2024 on the file of the Court of the Judicial Magistrate No.III, Tirunelveli, dismissing the petitions filed under Section 156(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the Manager of Nangooram Namma Veedu complex and he has filed the above petitions with the authorization given by the owner of the property one Rajasekar, that the said Rajasekar developed Nangooram Namma Veedu scheme along with entertainment facilities in the buildings, by name, Kondattam in the plot Nos.34, 35, 36, 53, 54 and 56, that the said Rajasekar has approached the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) Court with regard to the residents' committee, in which,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
