Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
JUSTICE, J
M/s.United India Insurance Company Limited – Appellant
Versus
Chennai Metro Rail Limited (CMRL) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition challenges land acquisition notice. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. counter affidavit from respondents on acquisition. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. public hearing and objections to acquisition. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. petitioner's arguments against acquisition. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. promissory estoppel in public authority actions. (Para 20 , 21) |
| 6. legal principles of non-arbitrariness and fairness. (Para 22 , 23) |
| 7. reliance on government representations. (Para 24 , 25) |
| 8. defenses against promissory estoppel. (Para 26 , 27) |
| 9. application of promissory estoppel. (Para 29 , 30) |
| 10. state's obligations under promissory estoppel. (Para 31 , 32) |
| 11. fairness in administrative actions. (Para 33 , 34) |
| 12. impact of pil on acquisition plans. (Para 35 , 36) |
| 13. state's power to acquire religious land. (Para 37 , 38) |
| 14. legitimacy of land acquisition for public purposes. (Para 39 , 40) |
| 15. balancing public interest with religious rights. (Para 41 , 42) |
| 16. unfairness in the acquisition process. (Para 43 , 44) |
| 17. court's final ruling and implications. (Para 45 , 46) |
ORDER
This a petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India challenging a notice dated 26.9.2024 issued by the second respondent - the Chenna
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
