Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. ANAND VENKATESH, J
A. Mohammed Appas – Appellant
Versus
L.S.Churchil Chinnaiah – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. common issue in review applications. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding government orders and eligibility. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 12 , 13) |
| 3. court's observations on review jurisdiction. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
COMMON ORDER
The issue involved in all these Review Applications are common and hence, they are taken up together, heard and disposed of through this common order.
2.Review Application Nos.171 and 172 of 2025 have been filed by the State of Tamil Nadu and the Education Department, to review the order passed in W.P.No.9011 of 2022. Review Application No.171 of 2025 pertains to the post of P.G. Assistant and Review Application No.172 of 2025 pertains to the post of B.T. Assistant.
3.Review Application No.170 of 2025 pertains to the extension of the benefit conferred by the order passed by this Court in the writ petition to Typists on par with Junior Assistants.
4.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.
5.The learned Advocate General appearing on behalf of the review applicants in Review Application Nos.171 and 172 of 2025 submitted that certain vital facts were not bro
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
