Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
G.JAYACHANDRAN, J
Sidalatchoumy – Appellant
Versus
Rukumani(died) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts detailing the property claims and familial relationships. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. arguments challenging the validity of the will and discussing evidence. (Para 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 3. court's observations on evidence standards for will validation. (Para 12 , 19) |
| 4. the court's ruling about evidentiary sufficiency of the will. (Para 14 , 17) |
| 5. final verdict and implications for the parties involved. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT Suit for preliminary decree of partition filed by the appellant herein in O.S.No.100 of 2011 dismissed by the trial court on 17.11.2021. Hence, the present appeal.
2. The case of the appellant as found in her plaint is that the suit schedule property belongs to her father Ramasamy. While her mother Camalatchy @ Canagam was alive and her marriage with Ramasamy was in subsistence, the first defendant Rukumani became intimate to her father while he was carrying on business at Mumbai. Ramasamy had flourishing business in Mumbai and had purchased properties at various places in Pondicherry, Tamilnadu and Mumbai. The schedule mentioned property was purchased by him and let out for rent. The plaintiff was put in possession of the house purchased by her father at Muth
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
