Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.SRIMATHY, J
State – Appellant
Versus
M. Velayutham – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. parties' arguments regarding tet applicability. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court's analysis on tet qualifications and minority institutions. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35) |
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.SRIMATHY, J.
The present writ appeal is filed by the respondents in the writ petition against the order, dated 25.06.2024, passed in W.P.(MD)No.5806 of 2024.
2. The writ petition was filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order, dated 22.02.2024, passed by the 2nd respondent and consequently, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to approve the petitioner's appointment as B.T. Assistant (Tamil) in the 3rd respondent school based on the proposal, dated 12.06.2023, without insisting for qualification of TET in the light of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court and to disburse grant-in-aid towards salary.
3. The writ petitioner was appointed on 12.06.2023 as B.T. Assistant (Tamil) in the resultant promotion vacancy of one Paul Samuvel, who was promoted as Headmaster in the resp
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
