Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S. SRIMATHY, J
State – Appellant
Versus
Mrs.V. Anbuchelvi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. writ appeal challenging appointment approval. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments on tet applicability for minority schools. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of rte act and minority school rights. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. constitutional validity of educational provisions. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. qualifications for teachers under rte act. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 6. tet qualification applicability to all schools. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 7. withdrawal of appeal does not exempt tet requirement. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. final opinion on tet qualification applicability. (Para 35) |
(Judgment of the Court was delivered by S.SRIMATHY, J.
This Writ Appeal is filed by the respondents in the writ petition challenging the order dated 16.10.2024 passed in W.P.(MD)No.21959 of 2024.
2. The writ petition was filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to quash the order, dated 29.08.2024, passed by the 3rd respondent and further, to direct the 3rd respondent to approve the appointment of Mrs.V. Anbuchelvi in the post of B.T. Assistant (English) within stipulated time.
3. The writ petitioner school had appointed Mrs.V.Anbuchelvi on14.08.2024
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
