SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35697

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. DHANABAL
Jenson Muthuraj – Appellant
Versus
The Superintendent of Police – Respondent



BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 12.03.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P(MD)No.6695 of 2025 Jenson Muthuraj ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Colachel, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

5.Raja Pratapsingh

6.Paramban Jeyraj ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct enquiry and dispose the petitioner's complaint, dated 05.02.2025 and pass such further or other orders as this Court.

For Petitioner : Mr.J.Mohamed Ashik Jaman For R-1 to R-4 : Mr.R.M.Anbunithi Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

The present petition has been filed for issuance of Writ of Mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 4 to conduct enquiry and dispose the petitioner's complaint, dated 05.02.2025.

2. According to the petitioner, the petitioner lodged a complaint against the private respondents and thereafter, the respondents have not taken any steps and not even enquired the matter. Therefore, the petitioner filed this petition.

3. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the official respondents would submit that based on the complaint given by the petitioner, they assigned CSR No.219 of 2025 and thereafter, the petitioner has not cooperated for enquiry and not even appeared for enquiry. If the petitioner appears for enquiry, they will conduct enquiry and dispose of the same within a week.

4. Considering the limited scope of prayer sought for in this petition, this Court even without issuing notice to the private respondents inclined to dispose of this petition.

5. Since the third respondent admitted the pending complaint of the petitioner for enquiry, this Court recording the same, directs the third respondent to complete the enquiry, within a period of one (1) week from the date of this order in accordance with law.

6. With the above said observations, this writ petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

12.03.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes BTR To

1.The Superintendent of Police, Nagercoil, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Colachel, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

4.The Sub Inspector of Police, Karungal Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

P.DHANABAL, J.

BTR

12.03.2025

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top