IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
HDB Financial Services Limited – Appellant
Versus
M Manivannan – Respondent
THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2025 CORAM:
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No.319 of 2025 M/s.HDB Financial Services Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory P. Saravanan .... Applicant vs
1. M. Manivannan & 3 others .... Respondents For Applicant : Mr.M. Arunachalam - - - - -
The Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court has repossessed the vehicle. He has also submitted a report to that effect. The notice sent to the respondents 1 and 2 has been returned as “unclaimed”. The notice sent to the respondents 3 and 4 have been duly served. The returned covers received from respondents 1 and 2 and the delivery reports pertaining to service of notice on respondents 3 and 4 have been enclosed along with the Affidavit of Service. Since the notice sent to the respondents 1 and 2 has been returned with the endorsement “unclaimed”, which amounts to deemed service, they are set ex-parte by this Court. Similarly, the respondents 3 and 4 have been duly served with the notice as seen from the delivery reports. Hence, they are also set ex-parte by this Court. Since the vehicle has been repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner, nothing survives for further a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.