SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 35703

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice ABDUL QUDDHOSE
HDB Financial Services Limited – Appellant
Versus
M Manivannan – Respondent


THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 13.03.2025 CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE Arb. Appln. No.319 of 2025 M/s.HDB Financial Services Ltd., Rep. by its Authorised Signatory P. Saravanan .... Applicant vs

1. M. Manivannan & 3 others .... Respondents For Applicant : Mr.M. Arunachalam - - - - -

The Advocate Commissioner appointed by this Court has repossessed the vehicle. He has also submitted a report to that effect. The notice sent to the respondents 1 and 2 has been returned as “unclaimed”. The notice sent to the respondents 3 and 4 have been duly served. The returned covers received from respondents 1 and 2 and the delivery reports pertaining to service of notice on respondents 3 and 4 have been enclosed along with the Affidavit of Service. Since the notice sent to the respondents 1 and 2 has been returned with the endorsement “unclaimed”, which amounts to deemed service, they are set ex-parte by this Court. Similarly, the respondents 3 and 4 have been duly served with the notice as seen from the delivery reports. Hence, they are also set ex-parte by this Court. Since the vehicle has been repossessed by the Advocate Commissioner, nothing survives for further a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top