Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P. Velmurugan, K.K. Ramakrishnan, JJ
District Collector, Dindigul District – Appellant
Versus
C.Muthukalyani @ Muthukannan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. market value determined by willing buyer-willing seller principle (Para 8 , 9) |
| 2. guesstimation principle applied in valuation (Para 12) |
| 3. belting system valuation method accepted (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. segment-wise market valuation based on location (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN , J.,)
| Summary of Discussion | Paragraph Nos |
| Prelude | 1 |
| Brief facts of the case | 2-2.6 |
| Submission of Learned Additional Advocate General | 3-3.5 |
| Submission of Learned Counsel for the Respondent/Land owner | 4-4.2 |
| Points for Determination | 5-5.1 |
| Discussion on Facts | 6-6.5 |
| Discussion on Merits | 7 |
| Meaning of Market Value | 8 |
| Consider factor lay down by Hon’ble Supreme Court to Determine Market Value | 9-9.4 |
| Merits and demerits of the General patten by LAO | 10-10.9 |
| Merits and De-merit of the award passed by the PDJ | 11-11.1 |
| Principle relation to the applicant of Doctrine of Guesstimation | 12-12.5 |
| Theory of Belting System | 13-13.2 |
| Principle relation to the applicant of belting system | 14-14.1 |
| Determination of fair market value of segment Nos.1&2 | 15 |
| Determination of the compensation of S.Nos.409/1B2, 409/102B, 410/1A, 410/1B1A, 410/1B3, 409/1A2A, 419/2A, 420/2A | 16-16.4 |
| Determination and co | |
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
