Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MR. SATHI KUMAR SUKUMARA KURUP, J
Vanaja Munian – Appellant
Versus
Bhuvanagiri Town Panchayat, represented by its Executive Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dispute over land ownership and construction rights. (Para 2 , 3 , 5) |
| 2. defense of encroachment and past agreements. (Para 4 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. arguments for claim validity. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 4. rationale behind the decision and dismissal of the appeal. (Para 26 , 27) |
JUDGMENT
The Second Appeal has been filed against the judgment and decree dated 27.06.2013 passed in A.S. No. 31 of 2012 on the file of the learned Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram reversing the judgment and decree dated 02.08.2012 passed in O.S. No. 10 of 2003 on the file of learned Principal District Munsif, Chidambaram.
2. The Plaintiff in the suit is the Appellant in this Appeal. He had filed the suit against the Respondent/first Defendant and one other Ravi @ Rajagopalan for a permanent injunction restraining the Defendants, their men, agents and persons claiming under them from in any manner interfering with the Plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property and not to evict the Plaintiff from the suit property.
3. According to the Plaintiff, he had purchased suit scheduled property by a registered Sale Deed dated 10.05.2000 and from then on, he is in possession and enjoyment of the same. It
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
