IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Honourable Mr Justice M. SUNDAR
C.LEELAVATHI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 28.03.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. KALAIMATHI W.P.No.10849 of 2025 C. Leelavathi Petitioner vs.
1. The District Collector Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 606 601
2. The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 606 101
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai District Thiruvannamalai 606 101
4. The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk Office Vengikkal Thiruvannamalai District 606 101
5. The Block Development Officer (Block Panchayat)
Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 606 601
6. The President Nallavanpalayam Village Thiruvannamalai Taluk Thiruvannamalai District
7. Kasthuri (Councillor)
Nallavanpalayam Village Thiruvannamalai Taluk Thiruvannamalai District Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing the respondents 1 to 5 especially the fifth respondent, to act on the petitioner's representation dated 06.12.2024 by implementing the order dated 25.05.2023 passed by this Court in W.P.No.16227 of 2023 in pursuance of the order dated 02.08.2023 passed by the first respondent under his proceedings dated 02.08.2023 vide Na.Ka.No.A2/1028567/2023 and thereby, forthwith removal of encroachments / illegal structures as constructed in the form of kitchen/cooking room in the water body (odai poramboke) which is comprised in S.F. No.67/2 of Samuthiram, Nallavanpalayam Village, Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District, put up by respondents 6 and 7 and to file an appropriate valid report by the fifth respondent towards the removal of the said encroachments and further, direct him to carry out periodic inspection and survey and to take all effective steps to ensure that the said water canal is free of encroachments of any nature in future.
For petitioner Mr. L.K. Manjunath
ORDER
[made by M. SUNDAR, J.]
After some arguments, Mr. L.K. Manjunath, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner, sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'writ petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) but made a plea to preserve all the rights and contentions of the writ petitioner to file a contempt petition, if so advised and so desired qua order dated 25.05.2023 in W.P.No.16227 of 2023. This request is acceded to.
2. Learned counsel has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:
M.SUNDAR, J.
and R. KALAIMATHI, J.
cad
3. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP stands disposed of as withdrawn/closed, albeit with preservation of rights of the writ petitioner in the aforesaid manner. There shall be no order as to costs.
(M.S., J.) (R.K.M., J.)
28.03.2025 cad Index : Yes/No NC : Yes/No To:
1. The District Collector Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 606 601
2. The District Revenue Officer Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 606 101
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer Thiruvannamalai District, Thiruvannamalai 606 101
4. The Tahsildar Thiruvannamalai Taluk Office Vengikkal, Thiruvannamalai District 606 101
5. The Block Development Officer (Block Panchayat)
Thiruvannamalai Thiruvannamalai District 606 601
6. The President Nallavanpalayam Village Thiruvannamalai Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.