Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.KALAIMATHI, J
Sekar – Appellant
Versus
Krishnan Dhandapani (Deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner failed to appear, leading to case dismissal. (Para 1) |
| 2. court notes ongoing absence, indicating serious representation issues. (Para 2) |
| 3. final decision dismisses case and appeal due to non-prosecution. (Para 3) |
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 24.06.2025, none represented for the petitioner. A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the effect that he has withdrawn the vakalat on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, Registry was directed to print the name of the petitioner in the cause list and post the matter, today.
2. The 1st respondent is represented through his counsel Ms.S.Pavitrashini.
3. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution and the second appeal is also rejected in SR Stage itself.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
