IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.VELMURUGAN, J
Mani – Appellant
Versus
State represented by, The Inspector of Police, Barur Police Station, Krishnagiri District. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. existence of prima facie evidence against petitioners. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. final decision on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the first respondent-Police and perused the materials available on record.
4. On a reading of F.I.R and also charge sheet filed by the respondent-Police, statement of witnesses recorded by the respondent- Police under Section 161Cr.P.C., and other materials, it is seen that prima facie allegations and materials are available as against the petitioner to proceed the case further. The grounds taken by the petitioners are nothing but defence which can be agitated only during the course of trial before the Trial Court. Hence, this Court is not inclined to quash the case in C.C.No.40 of 2024 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Pochampalli, Krishnagiri District.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.