ORDER

The revision petition is filed at the instance of the plaintiff who had filed I.A.No.4 of 2024 under Section 60(A) and (C) of Bharathiya Sakshya Adhiniyam , 2023.

2. The plaintiff attempted to produce and mark a photostat copy of the survey sketch. According to the plaintiff, the original was not available with the petitioner and he attempted to get certified copy from the officials concerned. However, the old records have been destroyed. And hence, the plaintiff was not in a position to get certified copy. The petitioner/plaintiff therefore sought leave of the Court to mark a photostat copy.

3. The application was opposed by the defendants contending that there is no plausible explanation or reason assigned for non-production of the original document which is only a public document and it can always be summoned from the authority concerned or at least a certified copy of the same can be filed.

4. The trial Court after considering the submissions of the learned counsel on either side held that the application seeking to mark the photostat copy of the public document is misconceived and not maintainable and proceeded to dismiss the application.

5. Heard Ms.H.Kavitha, learned counse