IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Mrs.R.KALAIMATHI, J
Sekar – Appellant
Versus
Krishnan Dhandapani (Deceased) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. delay in filing appeal addressed. (Para 1) |
| 2. non-appearance led to dismissal. (Para 2) |
| 3. final judgment rendered dismissing petitions. (Para 3) |
Prayer in CMP.No.12807 of 2019.: This Civil Miscellaneous Petition is filed under Order XLI R. 3A of CPC r/w U/O XLII R.1 of CPC, to condone the delay of 3257 days in filing the above second appeal.
Prayer in SA.SR.No.24611 of 2018 : This Second appeal is filed under Order 100 of C.P.C., setting aside the decree and Judgment dated 30.04.2009 made in A.S.No.36 of 2007 on the file of Additional Subordinate Judge, Tindivanam confirm the Decree and Judgment dated 20.04.2007 made in O.S.No.539 of 2004 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Judge, Tindivanam, with costs. For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Ms.S.Pavitrashini for M/s.V.Manohar for R1 Mr.N.Nanmaran for R6 No Appearance for R5 R3 and R4 Steps due R7 and R8 Minor rep by R6
ORDER
When the matter came up for hearing on 24.06.2025, none represented for the petitioner. A memo has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner to the effect that he has withdrawn the vakalat on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, Registry was directed to print the n
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.