Back
2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 42000
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.T. ASHA, J
Palanisamy.M – Appellant
Versus
Dr.S.Uma, I.A.S., District Collector Namakkal District Namakkal – Respondent
Contempt Petition No.1818 of 2025 | W.P.No.1500/2025
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.M.Subash
For the Respondents: Mr.A.Selvendran
Compliance with court orders is essential to avoid contempt, and the court will dismiss petitions once compliance is established.
Headnote:In a contempt petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, the petitioner alleged willful disobedience by the respondents to an earlier order of the court. The respondents claimed compliance with the said order, submitting relevant proceedings from the second respondent. The court concludes that the contempt petition is closed as compliance has been recorded.
Result: The contempt petition is closed.
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. willful disobedience of court orders leads to contempt proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 02.07.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Ms. JUSTICE P.T. ASHA Contempt Petition No.1818 of 2025 Palanisamy.M ... Petitioner Vs.
1.Dr.S.Uma, I.A.S., District Collector Namakkal District Namakkal.
2.Mrs.S.Suganthi Revenue Divisional Officer Tiruchengode Namakkal District. ... Respondents Prayer: Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 , to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.1500/2025 dated 23.01.2025.
For Petitioner : Mr.M.Subash For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader
ORDER
This contempt petition is filed alleging willful disobedience by the respondent to the order of this Court dated 23.01.2025 passed in W.P.No.1500 of 2025.
2. Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the order passed by this Court in W.P.No. 1500 of 2025 on 23.01.2025, has been complied with, and he has also produced before the Court the proceedings of the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.1072/2025/Voo dated 30.06.2025.
3. Recording the above, the contempt petition is closed.
