SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 42054

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
Viswanathan – Appellant
Versus
Gayathri – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Petitioners: Mr.K.Sudhakar
For the Respondent: Mr.SMS Shriram Narayanan

ORDER

The petitioners are father-in-law, mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the respondent. The respondent is the wife of one Premkumar and their marriage was celebrated on 19.02.2018 and a girl child was born on 09.04.2019. The respondent/wife filed HMOP No.2 of 2020 against Premkumar/husband on 03.01.2020. The husband of the respondent/wife did not choose to contest the said proceedings and ultimately, a decree for divorce was granted on 31.03.2021. After a lapse of two years and more, the respondent/wife has filed a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act against the revision petitioners herein.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that nowhere in HMOP No.2 of 2020, there has been any allegation against the present revision petitioners herein. Further, at no point of time, the respondent/wife lived with the revision petitioners and after marriage, respondent/wife moved with her husband to New Delhi and therefore, it is a false claim and the allegations are vexatious and the complaint given under Domestic Violence Act is sought to be struck off.

4. Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/wife would submit that ev

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top