Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judge, J
D.S.KUMARI – Appellant
Versus
LAKSHMI NARASIMHALU – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. partition suit filed for property division. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. settlement deeds executed with payment conditions. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. defendants' legal heirs added to the suit. (Para 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. issues framed regarding maintainability and rights. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 5. plaintiff's right to partition and allegations against defendants. (Para 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. defendants' arguments against plaintiff's claims. (Para 24) |
| 7. court's review of evidence and deeds. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 8. irrevocability of settlement deeds established. (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. plaintiff's charge over properties due to unpaid amounts. (Para 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60) |
| 10. plaintiff's right to recover amounts affirmed. (Para 61 , 62 , 63) |
| 11. appointment of advocate commissioner for jewel partition. (Para 84 , 85 , 86) |
| 12. final decree and costs determined. (Para 87) |
JUDGMENT
This partition suit has been filed by the plaintiff for the following reliefs:-
(a)For partition and separate possession of 1/3rd undivided share in the suit properties;
(b)For appointment of an Advocate Commissioner to divide the suit properties by metes and bounds and to allot 1/3rd share to the plaintiff
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
