Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
Judge, J
A-1 B.Ramakrishna Prasad, A-3 – Appellant
Versus
A-2 G.S.Subburaman – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction details of accused (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. prosecution case and charges (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. accused's denial and trial process (Para 8) |
| 4. arguments by a-1, a-2 counsel (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. prosecution's rebuttal (Para 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 6. evidence and witness testimonies (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. court's findings and analysis (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 8. verdict on conspiracy charges (Para 38) |
| 9. sentencing and compensation order (Para 39) |
| 10. final judgment outcome (Para 40) |
COMMON JUDGMENT
A. The appeals :
These two appeals are directed against the judgment dated 12.10.2012 passed in C.C.No.4 of 2002 by the learned II Additional Sub Judge (CBI cases relating to Banks and Financial Institutions), Chennai. By that judgment, the trial court found the appellants in Crl.A.No.757 of 2012, tried as Accused 1 and 3, and the appellant in Crl.A.No.750 of 2012, tried as Accused No.2, guilty of the charges against them.
2. The appellants will hereinafter be referred to as A-1 to A-3 for convenience.
B. Details of Conviction & Sentence by the Trial Court:
3. After trial, the trial Court convicted and sentenced A-1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
