SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 43634

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, A.D.MARIA CLETE, JJ
Aachiyammal – Appellant
Versus
The Authorized Officer, M/s.HDB Financial Services Limited – Respondent
W.P(MD)No.18697 of 2025 | W.M.P.(MD) Nos.14329 and 14330 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.R.Maheswaran
For the Respondents:

The order under Section 14 of the Securitisation Act is appealable under Section 17, granting remedy at the Debts Recovery Tribunal.

Headnote:The Writ Petition challenges the order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate under Section 14 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Court determined that the order is appealable under Section 17 of the Act, allowing the petitioner to seek remedy at the Debts Recovery Tribunal. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]

The order passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Thanjavur at Kumbakonam in Cr.M.P.No.1193/2024, dated 20.01.2025 is under challenge in the present writ proceedings.

2. The Chief Judicial Magistrate passed an order under Section

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top