Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
L.Victoria Gowri, J
Kulanthaivel – Appellant
Versus
State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner claims to be leaseholder of violated vehicle. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. arguments regarding ownership and custody claims presented. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court considers deterioration of vehicle value. (Para 7) |
| 4. court permits return of vehicle under specified conditions. (Para 8) |
ORDER
The Criminal Revision is directed against the order passed in Crl.M.P.No.148 of 2025 in Crime No.16 of 2025 dated 29.04.2025 on the file of the District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate, Thirumayam dismissing the petition filed under Section 497 of B.N.S.S.
2. The petitioner claims to be the lease holder and the 2nd respondent is the owner of the vehicle Bharat Benz bearing Registration No.TN 63 AP 4113. The respondent police has registered a case in Crime No.16 of 2025 for the offences under Sections 303(2) of BNS and 21(1), 21(2) of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation Act) and seized the above said vehicle for the alleged illegal transportation of sand and the same was produced before the concerned Court and the same came to be remanded and the same is under the custody of the respondent police.
3. It is not in dispute that the petitioner has approached the learned Distri
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
