Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
Jeevanandam Rajesh – Appellant
Versus
The Regional Passport Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's claims about limited passport validity. (Para 1 , 4) |
| 2. court hearings on passport renewal procedure. (Para 2 , 5) |
| 3. necessity for valid reasoning in passport authority's decisions. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 4. final verdict to renew passport for 10 years. (Para 7) |
| 5. writ petition disposed with directions. (Para 8) |
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the proceedings of the respondent dated 11.11.2024 and for a consequential direction to the respondent to renew the passport of the petitioner for a period of ten 10 years, which was renewed only for a period of one year from 11.11.2024.
2. Heard Mr.R.Sankaranarayanan, learned Senior Advocate for Mr.Arjun Suresh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Ramprabu, Additional Central Government Standing counsel for respondent.
3. The case of the petitioner is that there are criminal cases pending against the petitioner and the particulars of the same is extracted hereunder:-
Authority / Court before whom the case is pending trial/ investigation
Case /FIR/Warrant number
Particulars of complaint
CBI, Bengaluru
CBI/BS&FC/13/2018
Section 120 B r.w 420, 468 & 471 of the Indian
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
