IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
K.Sekar – Appellant
Versus
The Bank Manager Indian Overseas Bank, Saligramam, Chennai 600093 – Respondent
ORDER
This writ petition has been filed challenging the freezing of the bank account of the petitioner maintained before the respondent Bank.
2.Heard Mr.T.Balachandran, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.Rahuljain, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent.
3.The petitioner's Bank account was freezed mainly on the ground that an FIR came to be registered against the petitioner in Crime No.349 of 2024 for offence under the Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act, 2003 . The respondent has stated in the counter affidavit that the bank account was not freezed unilaterally by the respondent and they were asked to freeze the bank account by the Sub Inspector of Police, K-10, Koyambedu Police Station. 4.In the considered view of this Court, the police cannot direct the respondent Bank to straight away freeze the bank account without following the due process. That apart, the police will have to necessarily follow the mandate under Section 102 of Cr.P.C., 5.In the light of the above discussion, there shall be a direction to the respondent bank to defreeze the bank account and permit the petitioner to operate the bank account.
6.This writ petition is d
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.