Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
S.M. SUBRAMANIAM, B.PUGALENDHI, JJ
A.Dhanaraj – Appellant
Versus
A.Yogakumar Corera – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. review petition filed regarding prior unauthorized construction ruling. (Para 1) |
| 2. arguments focus on no grounds for review based on prior observations. (Para 2 , 4) |
| 3. court's observations on unauthorized construction and necessary actions. (Para 3) |
| 4. principles of review articulated; cannot serve as an appeal process. (Para 6) |
[Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.]
The review petition has been instituted to review the order dated
04.12.2020, passed in W.P.(MD)No.16796 of 2020.
2.The grounds for review reveal that the writ petitioner, namely, Mr.A.Yogakumar Corera, also put up unauthorised construction. The review petitioner is the second respondent in the writ petition. This Court made an observation that in the event of any such unauthorised construction made by the review petitioner, action to be taken. The observations made by this Court in the writ order would not provide the cause for filing a review petition. It is needless to state that the competent authorities are bound to deal with the unauthorised construction and action to be initiated. However, these observations in the writ petition would provide no cause for filing the review petition.
3.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
