SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 44801

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
N. Anand Venkatesh, J
R.SELVARANI – Appellant
Versus
THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR – Respondent
WP No. 25459 of 2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja Chozhan
For the Respondents:Mr.R.Neelagandan, Additional Advocate General, Mr.G.Velu Additional Government Pleader

The court reaffirmed the right to seek inclusion in legal heirship certificates, emphasizing thorough review processes for heir verification.

Headnote:The petitioner filed this writ of mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India concerning the cancellation of a legal heirship certificate issued on 18.06.2001, which excluded the petitioner's name. The court directed the 3rd respondent to ascertain the petitioner's status as a legal heir and reissue the certificate if valid. The principal issue revolved around confirming legal heirship status and amending documentation accordingly. The judgment resulted in a mandamus for a review of the heirship status and updating records, asserting rights under family law.

Table of Content
1. legal heirship claims and representation issues. (Para 1 , 3)
2. court's directive on reviewing heirship status. (Para 2 , 4)

ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the 3rd respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 18.04.2025 and to cancel the legal heirship certificate that has been issued on 18.06.2001 by the Tahsildar, Tambaram and reissue the same by including the name of the petitioner as the daughter of Late Kaleeswari.

2.Heard Mr.K.P.P.Raja Raja Chozhan, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.R.Neelagandan, learned Additional Advocate General appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 5.

3.The grievance expressed by the petitioner is that when the legal heirship certificate was issued by the 4th respondent on 18.06.2001, the petitioner who is the daughter of the deceased Kaleeswari was not included in the legal heirship certificate and only the name of the father and the brother of the petitioner was included. Therefore, the petitioner submitted a representation before the 3rd respondent to include the name of the petitioner in the legal heirship certificate. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed before this Court.

4.Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case and the materials placed before this Court, there shall be a direction to the 3rd respondent to deal with the representation made by the petitioner on 18.04.2025 and ascertain the fact as to whether the petitioner is a legal heir of Late Kaleeswari. In such an event, the name of the petitioner shall also be added in the legal heirship certificate and a fresh certificate will be issued. This process shall be completed by the 3rd respondent, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. Before issuing a fresh legal heirship certificate, notice shall be sent to the other two legal heirs who are the 6th and 7th respondents in this writ petition.

5.This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No Costs.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top