Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
C.Sridhar Reddy – Appellant
Versus
K.Kaja Mohideen – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the plaintiffs claimed property purchased by their ancestor. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. dismissal for default led to applications for restoration due to attorney failure. (Para 4) |
| 3. court emphasized plaintiffs' rights and valid representation should allow for reconsideration. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 4. civil petition allowed with conditions for deposit. (Para 14 , 15) |
O R D E R
These Civil Revision Petitions arise out of the same suit. Hence, they were clubbed together and heard for disposal.
2. The plaintiffs are the civil revision petitioners. It is the case of the plaintiffs that one Sundaramma purchased the suit schedule mentioned property by way of a registered sale deed on 30.03.1992. She passed away on 14.12.1999. She left behind as her legal heirs, the first plaintiff Chenga Reddy and her sons viz., the second plaintiff and one Prathap Reddy. It is the case of the plaintiffs that the defendants 1 to 7 had purchased the property from a person, who did not have title to alienate the same. On the basis of the fraudulent document which had been executed in favour of the defendants 1 to 7, they had mutated the revenue records in their favour. As the defendants have taken possession o
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
