IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V. Lakshminarayanan, J
V.P.Venkatachalam – Appellant
Versus
V.M.Periyasamy – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court challenges dismissal of forensic analysis request. (Para 1 , 2) |
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.06.2025 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN C.R.P.No.3034 of 2021 V.P.Venkatachalam .. Petitioner Vs.
V.M.Periyasamy .. Respondent Prayer: Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , against the fair and decreetal order dated 16.04.2021 made in I.A.No.3 of 2020 in A.S.No.76 of 2018 passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode.
For the Petitioner : Ms.R.Mahamandra Rajalakshmi For the Respondent : Mr.V.S.Kesavan ORDER This civil revision petition challenges the order passed by the learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Erode, in I.A.No.3 of
2020 in A.S.No.76 of 2018 dated 16.04.2021.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to as their ranks in the suit.
3.1. The civil revision petitioner is the respondent in the appeal.
O.S.No.775 of 1999, on the file of the Sub-Ordinate Court at Erode, was presented for recovery of a sum of Rs.4,12,320/-. The case of the plaintiff was that the defendant received a sum of Rs.2,40,000/- from him and had issued a post-dated cheq
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.