Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J
O.Ameerudeen Maricar – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Latheef – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. this petition arises from an order related to property execution. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. discussion on prior decrees and necessity of representation in executions. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. counterarguments by judgment debtors regarding authority and review application. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. details on representing decree holders through power of attorney. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. confirmation of agency in court and relevance of attorney's document. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. final ruling on the dismissal of the civil revision petition. (Para 12) |
ORDER
This civil revision petition arises out of the order and decretal order passed by the learned District Judge at Karaikal, in EA.No.6 of 2012 in unnumbered E.P of 2012 in O.S.No.8 of 1987 dated 30.04.2013.
2. For the sake of convenience, the parties would be referred to as per their ranks in the suit.
3. O.S.No.8 of 1987 is a suit for declaration that the plaintiffs are the absolute owners of the suit property, for recovery of possession of the same, and to pay costs and mense profits. After contest, the suit came to be decreed by the learned Additional District Judge, Pondicherry at Karaikal on 14.06.1988. The papers reveal that an appeal was preferred to this Cou
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
