Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. Balaji, J
Jabakar Samuel – Appellant
Versus
Jasmine – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seek to strike off dvc complaint. (Para 1) |
| 2. response addresses allegations and limitation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court notes seriousness of allegations. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. complaint against mother-in-law struck off. (Para 7) |
ORDER
Seeking to strike off the proceedings in D.V.C.No.32 of 2024 pending on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate, Additional Mahila Court, Chengalpet District, the petitioners have come up with the present Civil Revision Petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the parties.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would state that the petitioners are husband and mother-in-law of the respondent. The 1st petitioner and the respondent got married on 10.05.2019 and they are not blessed with any children. Admittedly, the 1st petitioner and the respondent got separated on 08.02.2022 and thereafter, the husband has moved the Family Court, Chengalpet seeking divorce by filing an application on 14.03.2024. After filing of the said divorce application and before receipt of summons/notices of H.M.O.P., the wife has chosen to issue a notice on 10.04.2024 stating that she is willing to rejoin the husband. According to the wife, only from the reply
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
