2025:MHC:1655 BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT RESERVED ON : 26.06.2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 15.07.2025 CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH W.P.(MD)No.26347 of 2024 and W.M.P.(MD) No.22326 of 2024 R.Balamurugan ... Petitioner Vs.
1.The Director General, Central Reserve Police Force, (Recruitment Branch), East Block-07, Level – IV, Sector -01, R.K. Puram, New Delhi-110 066.
2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, CRPF Group Centre, Aavadi, Chennai.
3.The Presiding Officer, Review Medical Board, Recruitment of Constable (GD)-2024, Centre-GC CRPF, Aavadi, Chennai. ... Respondents PRAYER : Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records relating to the impugned review medical examination report dated 07.10.2024 issued by the third respondent and quash the same and consequently directing the third respondent to review/re-conduct the medical examination and select the petitioner's candidature, without reference to the above alleged defect, for the post in the Central Armed Police Forces in pursuance of the recruitment notification dated 24.11.2023.
For Petitioner : Mr.D.Shanmugaraja Sethupathi For Respondents : Mr.J.Alaguram Jothi Central Government Standing Counsel
ORDER
The impugned review medical examination report dated 07.10.2024 issued by the third respondent is put under challenge in the present Writ Petition. Further, the petitioner has sought for a direction to the third respondent to review / re-conduct the medical examination and select him without reference to the above alleged defect, for the post in the Central Armed Police Forces in pursuance of the recruitment notification dated 24.11.2023.
2. The brief facts of the case is as follows:
2.1. The petitioner has completed his Under Graduation in the branch of Science. He applied for the post of 'Constables' called for by the Staff Selection Commission (SSC) in various Central Police Force, such as Border Security Force (BSF), Central Industrial Security Force (CISF) and Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) etc., through notification dated 24.11.2023 and participated in the recruitment process, which consists of Computer Based Examination, Physical Standard Test, Physical Efficiency Test, Medical Examination and Document Verification. Since I have been qualified in the computer based examination, I have undergone Certificate Verification, Physical Standard Test, Physical Efficiency Test and finally sent to Medical Examination, where I have been rejected on the ground of polydactyl on left hand. Further, I was sent to Review Medical Examination on 07.10.2024 and thereafter, the impugned order of non selection i.e., impugned review medical examination report dated 07.10.2024 was issued by the third respondent.
3. Assailing the impugned Review Medical Examination report dated 07.10.2024, the present Writ Petition has been preferred by the petitioner.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the impugned Review Medical Examination report has been issued by the third respondent without providing any opportunity of hearing of the petitioner, which is in violation of the principles of natural justice. He also submitted that the petitioner was declared to be unfit due to polydactyl, whereas there is no extra digit on the radial side of the hand of the petitioner, but however, the left hand thumb of the petitioner is only unsized, which cannot be categorized as 'polydactyl' and hence, the impugned Review Medical Examination report dated 07.10.2024 of the third respondent, is unsustainable and to be reviewed. He further submitted that the petitioner had already participated in the selection process conducted for the year 2022-2023, in which, Physical Test and Medical Examination were conducted on 03.05.2023 and the petitioner was declared medically fit which implies that the present Review Medical Examination report impugned in this petition, is fallacious.
5. The learned counsel for the petitioner pinpointed the revised uniformed guidelines for Review Medical Examination in the CAPFs and Assam Rifles dated 31.05.2021 of the Government of India, Ministry of Home Affairs, whereby the said guidelines was issued for Review Medical Board. In which, Clause 7 of the guideline gives discretion to the Medical Examination Board (MEB), in case of minor acceptable defects, the MEB can accept the candidature, if the defect will not in any way affect the efficiency of the candidate. The said Clause is extracted hereunder for ready reference:
Clause 7:-Minor Acceptable Defects Acceptance of candidates suffering from trifling defects:-
Candidates presenting with mild degree of the following defects may be accepted, as specified in the relevant paras:-
a)Mild Flat Feet-If the joints of tarsus are flexible and the arch reappears on standing on tip toes.
b)Mild Knock-Knee-With Inter-malleoli distance 5 cms or less.
c)Mild Bow legs-With inter-condylar distance 7cms or less.
d)Mild Hammer toes-If there are no painful corns or bursae on the dorsum of the toes.
e)Mild Varicocele-If veins are palpable after valsalvamanoeveour, otherwise invisible.
f)Slight stammering-If stammering appears after 4-4 sentences.
g)Healed tympanic membrane perforation.
h)Presen
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.