Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.B. BALAJI, J
M.Sindhuja – Appellant
Versus
Magesh – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks to set aside a previous order. (Para 1) |
| 2. counsel for both parties argue for waiver of cooling period. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. court notes lack of reconciliation and appropriate circumstances for waiver. (Para 5) |
| 4. civil revision petition allowed, prior order set aside. (Para 6) |
ORDER
The present revision has been filed by the petitioner/wife to set aside the Docket order dated 21.04.2025 in I.A.No.2 of 2025 in O.P.No.276 of 2025 on the file of the Sub-Judge, Alandur, refusing to waive the cooling period of six months.
2.Heard, the learned counsel for the petitioner/wife and the learned counsel for the respondent/husband.
3.The learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the respondent would place reliance on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Amardeep Singh Vs. Harveen Kaur in Civil Appeal.No.11158 of 2017 dated 12.09.2017 , where the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held that the Courts are empowered to waive the statutory period under Section 13B(2), if circumstances so warrant. One of the available circumstance, as set out by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, is that there is no possibility of the parties resolving their differences.
4.Here, the learne
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
