Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J
A.C.R.Mani – Appellant
Versus
K.J.Janarathanan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. injunction sought by co-owner in ongoing partition proceedings. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. issues of co-owner rights and ongoing injunction implications. (Para 5 , 10) |
| 3. final outcome is dismissal with suggestions for proper legal actions. (Para 11 , 12) |
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN S.A.No.1248 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 and CMP.No.9568 of 2020 A.C.R.Mani ... Appellant / Defendant Vs.
1.K.J.Janarathanan ... Respondent / plaintiff Prayer: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2009 in A.S.No.55 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Arani, confirming the judgment and decree dated 19.06.2008 in O.S.No.1037 of 1990 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arani.
For Appellant : Mr.R.Subramanian For Respondent : Mr.P.Chandrasekar
JUDGMENT
This Second Appeal has been filed to set aside the judgment and decree dated 21.08.2009 in A.S.No.55 of 2008 on the file of the Sub Court, Arani and the judgment and decree dated 19.06.2008 in O.S.No.1037 of
1990 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Arani.
2. Heard Mr.R.Subramanian, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr.P.Chandrasekar, learned
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
