Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR, J
R.Rajendran – Appellant
Versus
The Director of School Education – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. relief sought became unnecessary due to government orders. (Para 1) |
| 2. dismissed as infructuous with liberty for further action. (Para 2) |
O R D E R
It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the relief sought in this writ petition has become infructuous, in view of the subsequent orders passed by the Government and seeks liberty to take appropriate steps against the subsequent orders.
2. In the light of the above, this writ petition is dismissed as infructous granting liberty to the petitioners to take appropriate steps if any orders are passed by the Government subsequent to filing of the present writ petition. Connected miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. No costs.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
