Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
P.Velmurugan, J
K.JAYAMANI – Appellant
Versus
The State Rep. by the Superintendent of Police – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court orders police to transfer investigation. (Para 1) |
| 2. the court reviewed the inadequacy of prior police action as per the distinct allegations presented. (Para 2) |
| 3. the court pointed out the clear allegations in the complaint, negating the need for police investigation. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 4. the fir was quashed, directing a proper enquiry based on the detailed complaint. (Para 5) |
O R D E R
This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the first respondent to transfer the investigation in F.I.R in Crime No.367 of 2025 from the file of the fourth respondent to the third respondent and to conduct investigation and file final report in the abovesaid F.I.R in Crime No.367 of 2025, within a time frame.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondents-
Police and perused the materials available on record.
3. It is seen that the petitioner is the wife. When the matrimonial proceedings were pending, the husband had taken the petitioner's car without knowledge/permission of the petitioner. Hence, she made a complaint before the respondents- Police. Since the respondents-Police have not
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
