IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
C. Saravanan, J
Sree Krishna Construction, rep. by its Proprietor Kalaivani. – Appellant
Versus
The Commissioner, Rural Development and Panchayat Raj Department, Panagal Buildig, Saidepat, Chennai. – Respondent
ORDER
By this common order, these three Writ Petitions have been disposed of at the time of admission with the consent of the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Advocate General-I for the respondents.
2. In W.P.(MD)No.15275 of 2025, the petitioner has challenged the impugned Tender Notification, dated 16.05.2025 in respect of the package Nos. 5,11,12,13. In W.P.(MD) No.14744 of 2025, the petitioner has challenged the Tender Notification, dated 16.05.2025 in respect of the package No.2. In W.P. (MD) No.14753 of 2025, the petitioner has challenged the Tender Notification, dated 16.05.2025 in respect of the package No.6.
3. Earlier, an order came to be passed in respect of tender in W.P.(MD) No. 14445 of 2025, insofar as the package Nos.5,11,12 and 13 are concerned, as in the case of the petitioner in W.P.(MD) No.15275 of 2025. There, an interim order came to be passed on 22.05.2025. The relevant portion of the order reads as under:
“2.A perusal of the impugned tender notification reveals that the E-Tender has been published on 15.05.2025 and the closing date has been mentioned as 23.05.2025. In the light of Rule 20 of Tamil Nadu Transparency in Tender Rules, 2000,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.